Embedded Files
Force doctrine
Force doctrine is a biblical truth wherein those possessing coercive power define truth, morality, and rights, enforcing compliance by granting or withholding liberties, including authority over life and death. Under this doctrine, rights are not inherent but dispensed by the ruling power, and obedience is secured through law, threat, punishment, or violence.
In essence: truth is what can be enforced, rights are what can be allowed, and life itself is conditional upon submission.
However, all force doctrine, whether exercised by men, governments, or spiritual powers, ultimately rests in God alone. Every earthly authority operates either by His permission or in rebellion against Him, but none escapes His jurisdiction. The nations may wield force over men, but they themselves are nothing before the Almighty:
"Behold, the nations are as a drop of a bucket, and are counted as the small dust of the balance: behold, he taketh up the isles as a very little thing... All nations before him are as nothing; and they are counted to him less than nothing, and vanity." Isaiah 40:15, 17
All human power is temporary and derivative. God alone possesses absolute, eternal authority. All force doctrine terminates in Him.
The Broad Brush
Throughout Scripture, God has never been hesitant to paint with a broad brush when addressing a corrupt people. The Old Testament prophets repeatedly condemned nations, cities, and generations as a whole, even while God Himself knew there were exceptions within them. “Ah sinful nation, a people laden with iniquity” (Isaiah 1:4). That was not spoken to every individual act-by-act, but to a society characterized by sin. At the same time, God was never unwilling to narrow the brush and address specific men by name, whether for righteousness or for wickedness (2 Samuel 12:7; Ezekiel 18:4). Broad rebuke and specific indictment are not opposites in Scripture, they are complementary tools of truth. The following scriptural proofs are evidenced as objective truths to show forth the claim made.
In this context, God does not qualify His words with exceptions or caveats. He speaks of man collectively, using a broad brush to describe the condition of the entire earth. The corruption is set forth in sweeping, universal terms. In this instance, it is entirely possible that all, except the eight who entered the ark, were guilty. Whether or not that is so, God judged the whole earth as guilty, and judgment fell upon all, men and beasts alike, upon the earth and in the air
God indicts the nation as a body, even though righteous individuals, Isaiah himself included, clearly existed within it. He does not stop to catalogue faithful minorities or offer qualifying footnotes. The language is intentionally comprehensive, because God is not merely addressing isolated sins but the moral character of a people as a whole. Scripture therefore teaches that a culture, a nation, or a tribe may rightly be described in collective terms when its foundations have collapsed. As the psalmist asks, “If the foundations be destroyed, what can the righteous do?” (Psalm 11:3). The presence of a remnant does not negate the guilt of the whole, nor does it restrain God from speaking plainly about a corrupt society.
The Holiness of God
This treatise emerges from sustained theological reflection on the nature of God's holiness and its relationship to the origin of sin. The central question addressed is both profound and essential: If God is infinitely holy, as Scripture declares without equivocation, how could He have known sin before the fall of Satan?
The conventional answer, that God knew about sin beforehand but did not cause it while not entirely incorrect, fails to penetrate deeply enough into the radical implications of divine holiness. This work proposes a more rigorous thesis: God knew no sin at all before its manifestation through creaturely rebellion. Sin, being the absolute antithesis of God's nature, existed neither as eternal substance, competing principle, nor category within divine consciousness until it emerged through the voluntary transgression of a moral agent. If this is true, the question then arises: did God, by virtue of His foreknowledge or through any instruction, originate or introduce sin to His creatures so that it would proceed from them?
The argument proceeds from Scripture alone, grounding every proposition in the revealed Word of God. We begin with the testimony of the seraphim as they cry, "Holy, holy, holy" and trace through biblical revelation the unbridgeable chasm between the Creator's spotless purity and the creature's capacity for rebellion. The method is expositional and systematic, examining each relevant text in its context while building toward a coherent theological framework.
What emerges is a vision of God's holiness so absolute that it precludes even the internal, abstract knowledge of sin prior to its actualization. This is to show a proper limitation upon divine omniscience and its proper understanding: God knows all things that are necessary and all possibilities consistent with biblical truth. Sin, being pure negation and corruption, had no existence to be known until a creature departed from the path of righteousness.
The argument made that God can “know” something will happen for certain, but not influence free will is an illogical statement. For God to say to Adam, “and brought them unto Adam to see what he would call them: and whatsoever Adam called every living creature, that was the name thereof” (Genesis 2:19) would violate free will if God knew beforehand what Adam would call them! If that were true, why would God not tell us that he named them and then told Adam their names!
This treatise is offered to the Church in the hope that it will deepen our understanding of God's transcendent holiness and strengthen our confidence that the origin of evil lies wholly outside the divine nature. May the Lord use these reflections to magnify His glory and to comfort His people with the assurance that He is light, and “declare unto you, that God is light, and in him is no darkness at all” (1 John 1:5).
THE EYES OF THE LORD
THE EYES OF THE LORD
The Scriptures declare that God is not distant, detached, or abstract in His knowledge, but actively engaged in observing, testing, and responding to His creation.
“The eyes of the LORD are in every place, beholding the evil and the good.” (Proverbs 15:3)
This statement is not philosophical speculation. It is a precise declaration of how God relates to the world He has made. The language is deliberate: eyes, in every place, beholding. Each word must be allowed to retain its meaning.
Yet the history of theological reflection has not always honored that simplicity. A system imported from outside the Scripture, known broadly as classical omniscience (God exhaustively knows all things throughout time about every detail from before creation without learning anything), has been imposed upon these texts, replacing the language of observation with the language of timeless abstraction. This treatise examines what the Scripture actually teaches, exposes the error of that system, and sets forth the doctrine of divine knowledge as the Bible presents it.
This is why the Scripture warns, “Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit…” (Colossians 2:8). This warning is not against thinking, but against systems that override divine revelation. Classical definitions of omniscience, drawn from philosophical presuppositions, often impose a framework upon the text that the text itself does not teach. In doing so, they redefine plain words, ignore grammatical distinctions, and force statements of Scripture into meanings they were never intended to carry. When “beholding” no longer signifies observing, and “now I know” no longer denotes present knowledge, the matter ceases to be one of explanation and becomes one of replacement.
This philosophical conditioning has become so ingrained that many no longer read the Scriptures as they stand, but as they have been taught to presume they must mean. The result is a system that appears consistent within itself, yet is inconsistent with the actual words, truth, grammar, and logic of the Bible. I will demonstrate that this approach does not arise from careful exegesis, but from inherited assumptions that override the text. Instead of allowing Scripture to define God’s knowledge as it is revealed, men reshape the text to preserve a system. But the Word of God does not need philosophical support, rather it demands submission.
FAITH AND WORKS: A Biblical Distinction
The Word of God is precise. Every word matters. Every distinction carries meaning. When Scripture uses different terms, e.g. the “kingdom of God” and “kingdom of heaven” it does so intentionally, revealing complementary truths that must be understood separately before they can be appreciated together. At the heart of this distinction lies the relationship between faith and works, and the difference between entering God’s presence and inheriting promised blessings.
In every dispensation, men come to God by faith alone in what He says. This principle has never changed. From Abel to Abraham, from Moses to the Church, entrance into right relationship with God, what Scripture calls the kingdom of God, has always been, and will always be, by grace through faith, without works.
“But without faith it is impossible to please him:
for he that cometh to God must believe that he is,
and that he is a rewarder of them
that diligently seek him”
Hebrews 11:6
Whether under promise, law, or grace, no man has ever earned his way into God’s favor. Faith in God’s revealed word is the universal constant across all time.
However, the kingdom of heaven represents something distinct, a specific, physical, covenantal promise given to the nation of Israel based on the Abrahamic, Mosaic, and Davidic covenants. While entrance into this kingdom requires faith in the God of Israel (for without faith in God, there is no relationship at all), the inheritance within that kingdom is the actual possession of the promised land, participation in the restored nation, and ruling authority in the Messianic age that is conditioned upon obedient works under the Law.
Israel enters the kingdom of God by faith in the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob; but they inherit the everlasting possession through works.
Above when he said, Sacrifice and offering and
burnt offerings and offering for sin thou wouldest not,
neither hadst pleasure therein; which are offered by the law;
(Hebrews 10:8)
This is not two ways of salvation, it is one way to God (faith alone), with different inheritances based on God’s distinct dispensational dealings with His people.
Page updated
Google Sites
Report abuse